Comparison of interval breast cancer rates for two-versus single-view screening mammography: A population-based study
A. Seigneurin, C. Exbrayat, J. Labarère, M. Colonna
The Breast Volume 18, Issue 5, October 2009, Pages 284-288
Link to Journal
Two-view mammography for first and subsequent screens is associated with lower rates of interval breast cancer. This is at the expense of an increased number of women being recalled for further assessment after subsequent screens
Showing posts with label Interval cancer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Interval cancer. Show all posts
Thursday, 21 January 2010
Tuesday, 16 June 2009
Quality of mammography screening in the Milan programme: Evidence of improved sensitivity based on interval cancer proportional incidence and radiolog
Quality of mammography screening in the Milan programme: Evidence of improved sensitivity based on interval cancer proportional incidence and radiological review
Pirola Maria Elena, Houssami Nehmat, Maltagliati Ermes, Ceresa Piera, Quattrocchi Maria, Marinoni Guia, Caimi Francesco, Villa Roberto, Falda Giovanni, Gaffuri Isabella, Ciatto Stefano
The Breast 18, (3), June 2009: 208-210
Link to Journal
Interval cancer (IC) incidence and review-based initial evaluation of Milan service screening (ASLMI1) suggested suboptimal performance. We report results in a subsequent screening round to further determine screening quality.
Programme sensitivity is now within recommended European standards. Performance indicators improved relative to initial evaluation. Both increasing experience and formal training of radiologists are likely to have contributed to this improvement
Pirola Maria Elena, Houssami Nehmat, Maltagliati Ermes, Ceresa Piera, Quattrocchi Maria, Marinoni Guia, Caimi Francesco, Villa Roberto, Falda Giovanni, Gaffuri Isabella, Ciatto Stefano
The Breast 18, (3), June 2009: 208-210
Link to Journal
Interval cancer (IC) incidence and review-based initial evaluation of Milan service screening (ASLMI1) suggested suboptimal performance. We report results in a subsequent screening round to further determine screening quality.
Programme sensitivity is now within recommended European standards. Performance indicators improved relative to initial evaluation. Both increasing experience and formal training of radiologists are likely to have contributed to this improvement
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)