Showing posts with label vacuum assisted biopsy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label vacuum assisted biopsy. Show all posts

Tuesday, 16 June 2009

Accuracy of stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy with a 10-gauge hand-held system

Accuracy of stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy with a 10-gauge hand-held system
C. Salem, R. Sakr, J. Chopier, C. Marsault, S. Uzan, E. Daraï
The Breast 18, (3), June 2009: 178-182

Link to Journal

The mean number of core specimens obtained per procedure was 9 (range 4–24). Complete radiological excision of the target lesion was achieved in 31.6% (91 of 288) with 91% of these lesions smaller than 10 mm (mean size 7 mm; range 4–20 mm). Under-estimation of ADH and DCIS was 18.2% (2 of 11) and 19.2% (9 of 47), respectively. There was no false negative result within a 3-year follow-up (from 2005 till date). Complications were mild and consisted of immediate bleeding and delayed hematomas

Friday, 19 December 2008

Pain during vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: Are there any predictors?

Pain during vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: Are there any predictors?
George C. Zografos, Flora Zagouri, Theodoros N. Sergentanis, Afrodite Nonni, Philip Domeyer, Dimitra Koulocheri, Ioannis Flessas, Effrosyni Panopoulou, Dimosthenis Chrysikos, John Bramis
The Breast 17 (2008) 592e595

Link to Journal

Pain can be reduced by increased experience of the operator (shorter procedure times) and the avoidance of the luteal phase - timing is everything!

Management of lesions of uncertain malignant potential on breast core needle histology: an alternative to surgery in selected cases

Management of lesions of uncertain malignant potential on breast core needle histology: an alternative to surgery in selected cases
S.L. Tennant, A. Evans, L.J. Hamilton, J. James, A.H.S. Lee, Z. Hodi, I.O. Ellis, E.A. Rakha, A.R.M. Wilson
The Breast 17 (2008) 546–549

Link to Journal

Something we all aspire to do - not overtreat borderline lesions which could possibly be followed, after adequate Vacuum Assisted Biopsy. This is a sensible way to go, with adequate multidiscipinary discussion of the case, and close follow up


Friday, 15 February 2008

Atypical ductal hyperplasia: A way to minimize underestimation in vacuum-assisted breast biopsy?

Flora Zagouri, Theodoros N. Sergentanis, Dimitra Koulocheri, Aphrodite Nonni, John Bramis and George C. Zografos
The Breast Volume 17, Issue 1, February 2008, Page 6
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6WC2-4RV5S14-1&_user=4430&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000059594&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=4430&md5=cbdb6cda71a63b774631bde5c69d6618

The underestimation rate of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) diagnosed via vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VABB) is a crucial issue in the common clinical practice. Bedei et al. examined the underestimation of ADH diagnosis by VABB.
Independently, our research team has evaluated putative ways of minimizing underestimation rate in pre-invasive breast lesions.